Myopia evidence for clinicians

The effect sizes and assumptions behind the outlook calculator, and a free workspace for tracking follow-up in your own clinic.

Treatment effects used in the calculator

Percentage reduction versus control, from each main randomised trial
OptionRefractionAxial lengthTrial lengthSourcePopulation
MiyoSmart (DIMS) spectacle lenses52%62%2 yearsLam CSY et al., Br J Ophthalmol 2020;104:363-368Hong Kong, ages 8-13
Essilor Stellest (HAL) spectacle lenses55%51%2 yearsBao J et al., JAMA Ophthalmol 2022China, ages 8-13
MiSight 1 day contact lenses59%52%3 yearsChamberlain P et al., Optom Vis Sci 2019;96:556-5674 countries, ages 8-12
Orthokeratology night lenses43% *43%2 yearsCho P, Cheung SW, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:7077-7085 (ROMIO)Hong Kong, ages 6-10
Atropine 0.05%67%51%1 yearYam JC et al., Ophthalmology 2019;126:113-124 (LAMP)Hong Kong, ages 4-12
Atropine 0.025%43%29%1 yearYam JC et al., Ophthalmology 2019;126:113-124 (LAMP)Hong Kong, ages 4-12
Atropine 0.01%27%12%1 yearYam JC et al., Ophthalmology 2019;126:113-124 (LAMP)Hong Kong, ages 4-12
Repeated low-level red light75%66%1 yearJiang Y et al., Ophthalmology 2022;129:509-519China, ages 8-13

* ROMIO measured axial length only; the same effect is assumed for refraction.

How the projection works

  • Untreated progression at age 9 is −0.82 D/year in East Asian and −0.55 D/year in other children, falling 15% for each year of age up to 13 and 30% a year after (Donovan 2012; Brennan 2021 meta-analysis).
  • Axial elongation is taken as 0.5 mm per dioptre, as in the control arms of LAMP and DIMS.
  • Each treatment reduces progression by its trial percentage. Because trials last one to three years, a second, cautious scenario halves the effect after year three.
  • With two pre-treatment axial lengths and the interval, the untreated rate is scaled to the child's measured growth (limited to 0.2 to 3 times the average).
  • Long-term risk comes from Tideman 2016: visual impairment by 75 in about 4% (24 to 26 mm), 25% (26 mm or more), over 90% (30 mm or more).

Clinic workspace

Record glasses power, keratometry, axial length and treatment at every visit, chart growth against expected rates, and read printed biometry reports with built-in text recognition.

Sign in to the workspace

Sign-in is for approved clinicians. Ask Dr. Khan at the clinic to request an account.

Open the calculator in clinician mode

References

  1. Donovan L, Sankaridurg P, Ho A, et al. Myopia progression rates in urban children wearing single-vision spectacles. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:27-32.
  2. Gwiazda J, Hyman L, Hussein M, et al. A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses versus single vision lenses on the progression of myopia in children (COMET). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1492-1500.
  3. Tideman JWL, Snabel MCC, Tedja MS, et al. Association of axial length with risk of uncorrectable visual impairment for Europeans with myopia. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016;134:1355-1363.
  4. Brennan NA, Toubouti YM, Cheng X, Bullimore MA. Efficacy in myopia control. Prog Retin Eye Res 2021;83:100923.
  5. Yam JC, Jiang Y, Tang SM, et al. Low-concentration atropine for myopia progression (LAMP) study. Ophthalmology 2019;126:113-124.
  6. Lam CSY, Tang WC, Tse DY, et al. Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses slow myopia progression. Br J Ophthalmol 2020;104:363-368.
  7. Bao J, Huang Y, Li X, et al. Spectacle lenses with aspherical lenslets for myopia control vs single-vision spectacle lenses: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 2022.
  8. Chamberlain P, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Logan NS, et al. A 3-year randomized clinical trial of MiSight lenses for myopia control. Optom Vis Sci 2019;96:556-567.
  9. Cho P, Cheung SW. Retardation of myopia in orthokeratology (ROMIO) study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:7077-7085.
  10. Jiang Y, Zhu Z, Tan X, et al. Effect of repeated low-level red-light therapy for myopia control. Ophthalmology 2022;129:509-519.